``ALB021`` Alignment overall agreement of business logic and geometry - v2
========================================================================================================================================================================================================

.. parsed-literal::

   001 | \@implementer-agreement
   002 | \@ALB
   003 | \@version2
   004 | 
   005 | Feature: ALB021 - Alignment overall agreement of business logic and geometry
   006 |   The rule verifies that when an Alignment has both business logic and geometry (representation),
   007 |   the representation entity type must correspond to the layouts present in the business logic.
   008 | 
   009 | Background: Selecting an alignment that has both business logic and geometric representation
   010 |   :doc:`Given A model with Schema 'IFC4.3' </steps/givensattributespy_Afile_or_modelwithfieldvalues>`
   011 |   :doc:`Given An .IfcAlignment. [with business logic and geometric representation] </steps/thensalignmentpy_AnIfcAlignmentadditional_prose_matching>`
   012 | 
   013 | Scenario: Validating the presence of cant layout for IfcSegmentedReferenceCurve
   014 |   :doc:`Then  A representation by .IfcSegmentedReferenceCurve. requires the ^presence^ of .IfcAlignmentCant. in the business logic </steps/thensalignmentpy_Arepresentationbyifc_rep_criteriarequirestheexistenceabsence_or_presenceoflogic_entityinthebusinesslogic>`
   015 | 
   016 | Scenario: Validating the presence of vertical layout for IfcGradientCurve
   017 |   :doc:`Then  A representation by .IfcGradientCurve. requires the ^presence^ of .IfcAlignmentVertical. in the business logic </steps/thensalignmentpy_Arepresentationbyifc_rep_criteriarequirestheexistenceabsence_or_presenceoflogic_entityinthebusinesslogic>`
   018 | 
   019 | Scenario: Validating the absence of vertical and cant layout for IfcCompositeCurve as Axis
   020 |   :doc:`Then A representation by .IfcCompositeCurve as Axis. requires the ^absence^ of .IfcAlignmentVertical and IfcAlignmentCant. in the business logic </steps/thensalignmentpy_Arepresentationbyifc_rep_criteriarequirestheexistenceabsence_or_presenceoflogic_entityinthebusinesslogic>`
   021 | 
   022 | Scenario: Validating the absence of cant layout for IfcGradientCurve
   023 |   :doc:`Then A representation by .IfcGradientCurve. requires the ^absence^ of .IfcAlignmentCant. in the business logic </steps/thensalignmentpy_Arepresentationbyifc_rep_criteriarequirestheexistenceabsence_or_presenceoflogic_entityinthebusinesslogic>`

.. rubric:: Version history

.. list-table::
   :header-rows: 1

   * - Version
     - Tag
     - Date
     - Commit
     - Rule link
   * - v1
     - :tag:`v0.6.6`
     - 2024-01-22
     - :commit:`b3f3302bc9b9ff89f0e8eef4917bcddb012303ff`
     - n/a
   * - v2
     - :tag:`v0.8.0`
     - 2025-08-28
     - :commit:`9cefddf80b5ba198e769c6717f39ed3737563ac8`
     - `view <https://github.com/buildingSMART/ifc-gherkin-rules/blob/release/0.8.0/features/rules/ALB/ALB021_Alignment-overall-agreement-of-business-logic-and-geometry.feature>`_